The federal government has been involved with various forms of funding for the arts since it first came into existence. Governmental funding arts began, by some experts view, with the creation of the constitution and the copyright laws. But while this is the opinion of some, it does remain a fact that over many years they have provided different forms of funding for the arts. Although governmental funding arts have been debated in terms of its merits, this is still the way the government functions in the area of creative genres.
In the past century, for example, one form of governmental funding arts was seen by some with the Work Project Administration, WPA, which mainly existed to help with the problem of unemployment. Still this was a form of governmental funding arts, which also offered help to artists on a smaller scale than latter forms. While various experts and groups still disagree over the merits of governmental funding arts, it remains a part of the commitment in the federal budget. There is no indication it will end at any point.
With governmental funding arts today the primary means is through the National Endowment for the Arts. This program provides governmental funding arts assistance through possible federal grants as well as funding by state arts agencies and regional arts organizations.
These can be seen for their details and reviewed at the National Endowment for the Arts web site. There is information on the governmental funding arts that they assist the artist through their organization. Through their system the governmental funding arts are helped beyond the traditional copyright benefits and possible tax breaks.
For the artist this method of funding assistance is the best option he or she can find from any federal source. Plus it will also offer help in locating other means for funding support that exists for the artist. This will always make it a desirable place to check out for the artist seeking funding.
There will no doubt always be some disagreement over the use of federal tax dollars for the arts when there are so many groups in our society that feel they are underfinanced. This will never lead to any true harmony of views about the benefits of using tax revenues for something involved with creative venues that does not generate an actual product or services viewed as essential to public needs. Currently the system remains in place, which is good news for artist. Whether tomorrow it will change as a priority is something no one can determine with any real accuracy.